Baran, B., Krzyżowski, M., Rádai, Z., Francikowski, J., & Hohol, M. (2023). Geometry-based navigation in the dark: Layout symmetry facilitates spatial learning in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus, in the absence of visual cues. Animal Cognition, 23, 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01712-7
Grodniewicz, J. P., Hohol, M. (2023). Therapeutic conversational artificial intelligence and the acquisition of self-understanding. The American Journal of Bioethics. 23(5), 59–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2191021
Grodniewicz, J. P., Hohol, M. (2023). Waiting for a digital therapist: Three challenges on the path to psychotherapy delivered by artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1190084. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1190084
Hohol, M., Szymanek, P., Cipora, K. (2023). Analog magnitude representation of angles and its relation to geometric expertise. PsyArXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/z7dy9
Hohol, M., Wołoszyn, K., & Cipora, K. (2022). No fingers, no SNARC? Neither the finger counting starting hand, nor its stability robustly affect the SNARC effect. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103765
Gibbons, M., Versace, E., Crump, A., Baran, B., & Chittka, L. (2022). Motivational trade-offs and modulation of nociception in bumblebees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(31), e2205821119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205821119
Wołoszyn, K., Hohol, M., Kuniecki, M., & Winkielman, P. (2022). Restricting movements of lower face leaves recognition of emotional vocalizations intact but introduces a valence positivity bias. Scientific Reports, 12, 16101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18888-0
Hohol, M., Wołoszyn K., Brożek, B. (2021). Making cognitive niches explicit: On the importance of external cognitive representations in accounting for cumulative culture. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 15(734930). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2021.734930
Miłkowski, M., Hohol, M. (2021). Explanations in cognitive science: Unication versus pluralism. Synthese, 199(Suppl. 1), S1–S17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02777-y
Szymanek, P. (2021). I did not expect to be dreaming: Explaining realization in lucid dreams with a Bayesian framework. Consciousness and Cognition, 93(103163). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103163
Hohol, M. (2020). Foundations of geometric cognition. New York-London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056291
Hohol, M., Willmes, K., Nęcka, E., Brożek, B., Nuerk, H.-C., & Cipora, K. (2020). Professional mathematicians do not differ from others in the symbolic numerical distance and size effects. Scientific Reports, 10(11531). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68202-z
Miłkowski, M., Hohol, M., Nowakowski, P. (2019). Mechanisms in psychology: The road towards unity?. Theory & Psychology, 29(5), 567-568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319875218
Hohol, M., Miłkowski, M. (2019). Cognitive artifacts for geometric reasoning. Foundations of Science, 24(4), 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09603-w
Miłkowski, M., Hensel, W.M., Hohol, M. (2018). Replicability or reproducibility? On the replication crisis in computational neuroscience and sharing only relevant detail. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 45(3), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-018-0702-z
Hohol, M., Wołoszyn, K., Nuerk, H.-C., Cipora, K. (2018). A large-scale survey on finger counting routines, their temporal stability and flexibility in educated adults. PeerJ, 6(e5878). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5878
Miłkowski, M., Clowes, R.W., Rucińska, Z., Przegalińska, A., Zawidzki, T., Gies, A., Krueger, J., McGann, M., Afeltowicz, Ł., Wachowski, W.M., Stjernberg, F., Loughlin, V., Hohol, M. (2018). From wide cognition to mechanisms: A silent revolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2393). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02393
Brożek, B., Heller, M., Hohol, M. (Eds.). (2017). The concept of explanation. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press
Hohol, M., Baran, B., Krzyżowski, M., Francikowski, J. (2017). Does spatial navigation have a blind-spot? Visiocentrism is not enough to explain the navigational behavior comprehensively. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(154). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00154
Wołoszyn, K., Hohol, M. (2017). Commentary: The poverty of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(845). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00845
Hohol, M., Cipora, K., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C. (2017). Bringing back the balance: Domain-general processes are also important in numerical cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(499). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00499
Cipora, K., Hohol, M., Nuerk, H.-C., Willmes, K., Brożek, B., Kucharzyk, B., Nęcka, E. (2016) Professional mathematicians differ from controls in their spatial-numerical associations. Psychological Research, 80, 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0677-6